- Archive
- February 26
- November 25
- September 25
- May 25
- November 24
- July 24
- November 23
- October 23
- May 23
- March 23
- September 22
- August 22
- June 22
- May 22
- February 22
- November 21
- October 21
- September 21
- June 21
- May 21
- October 20
- May 20
- April 20
- March 20
- February 20
- October 19
- July 19
- May 19
- February 19
- January 19
- December 18
- November 18
- September 18
- June 18
- May 18
- April 18
- March 18
- January 18
- December 17
- November 17
- October 17
- September 17
- August 17
- July 17
- June 17
- May 17
- April 17
- March 17
- January 17
- December 16
- November 16
- October 16
- August 16
- June 16
- May 16
- April 16
- March 16
- January 16
- December 15
- September 15
- May 15
- March 15
- February 15
- October 14
- September 14
- June 14
- March 14
- December 13
- November 13
- June 13
- April 13
- March 13
- February 13
- January 13
- December 12
- November 12
- October 12
- June 12
- May 12
- April 12
- March 12
- January 12
- November 11
- October 11
- August 11
- July 11
- May 11
- April 11
- March 11
- February 11
- January 11
- December 10
- November 10
- October 10
- August 10
- July 10
- June 10
- May 10
- February 10
- January 10
- December 09
- November 09
- October 09
- September 09
- August 09
- July 09
- Categories
Measuring Media Concentration and Diversity: New Approaches and Instruments in Europe and the US
15th August 09Media, Culture & Society published an article by Natascha Just. The article describes and discusses new methods and instruments for measuring media concentration.
Abstract: Debates on media concentration and the appropriate way to handle it are not coming to an end. This article stresses the dual character of media goods, the underlying ideological ideals, and the attendant institutional setting as sources of value conflict in communications policy making. It discusses this value conflict and gives examples of where it surfaces and how it is confronted. It is particularly evident in cases of media concentration. Newly introduced communications laws and policies within Europe and the US aim to reduce (ownership) regulation, promote competition and cope with the challenges posed by convergence. This quest is coupled in part with protections of media pluralism through custom-developed indices for measuring concentration in media markets and tests for assessing media plurality in merger cases. The article describes and discusses these new methods and instruments as novel but imperfect attempts by policy makers to respond to the various challenges in communications such as value conflict, convergence, the need for empirical proof and claims for non-economic ways of assessing media diversity. It concludes by stressing the need to re-emphasize normative claims as essential guiding elements of communications policy making. Keywords: communications policy, Europe, measurement, media concentration, value conflict, US
